<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Case Results Archives - LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/category/case-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Employers Insurance Company Failure to Cover Claim</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/employers-insurance-company-failure-to-cover-claim/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Employers insurance company failure to cover claim leads to suit, final verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $15,000,000 Martin Stanley Law Offices represneted plaintiff in case against Everest National Insurance Company for failure to cover insurance claim in a near fatal worker accident. A dock worker working on a river clean up project...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/employers-insurance-company-failure-to-cover-claim/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/employers-insurance-company-failure-to-cover-claim/">Employers Insurance Company Failure to Cover Claim</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employers insurance company failure to cover claim leads to suit, final verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $15,000,000</p>
<p>Martin Stanley Law Offices represneted plaintiff in case against Everest National Insurance Company for failure to cover insurance claim in a near fatal worker accident.  A dock worker working on a river clean up project was severely injured in accident which resulted in amputation of both legs below the pelvic region.  Everests breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing resulted in an award of $15,000,000 to the plaintiff.  The trial lasted 5 days, deliberation 2hrs. and a 10-2 decision.</p>
<p>Verdict Search California  &#8211; August 22, 2005 Vol 4 Issue 33 O&#8217;Donnell vs. Everest National.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/employers-insurance-company-failure-to-cover-claim/">Employers Insurance Company Failure to Cover Claim</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Device Used for Back Pain Causes Paralysis</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-device-used-for-back-pain-causes-paralysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Medical Device used for back pain causes paralysis and results in judgment of $9,660,000 Represented by Martin Stanley Law Offices the plaintiff after receiving medical treatment resulting in paralysis of her legs as well as other related medical conditions due to medical malpractice. After receiving medical advice to undergo a treatment to mitigate back pain...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-device-used-for-back-pain-causes-paralysis/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-device-used-for-back-pain-causes-paralysis/">Medical Device Used for Back Pain Causes Paralysis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medical Device used for back pain causes paralysis and results in judgment of $9,660,000</p>
<p>Represented by Martin Stanley Law Offices the plaintiff after receiving medical treatment resulting in paralysis of her legs as well as other related medical conditions due to medical malpractice.  After receiving medical advice to undergo a treatment to mitigate back pain the plaintiff suffered severe bodily injury due to said procedure. After finding in favor of plaintiff the final judgment awarded was $9,660,000 while the original offer from defendants counsel was $100,000. The trial lasted 11 days with jury deliberation of 2 days and a final vote of 11-1.</p>
<p>Verdict of the week &#8211; Products Liability &#8211; Medical Devices, failure to warn &#8211; Medical Malpractice   5/31/2005 </p>
<p>McClafferty vs. Radionics/Tyco Healthcare</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-device-used-for-back-pain-causes-paralysis/">Medical Device Used for Back Pain Causes Paralysis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Malpractice Suit</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Law Offices of Martin Stanley which specializes in Medical Malpractice won a judgment for a wrongful death of a 31 year old woman. The woman, who was pregnant at the time, was not diagnosed properly when a mass was shown to exist after an ultrasound was performed. The attending physician was charged and found guilty...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-2/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-2/">Medical Malpractice Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law Offices of Martin Stanley which specializes in Medical Malpractice won a judgment for a wrongful death of a 31 year old woman. The woman, who was pregnant at the time, was not diagnosed properly when a mass was shown to exist after an ultrasound was performed. The attending physician was charged and found guilty of the wrongful death and ordered to pay the sum of $2,899,887 &#8211; the jury voted 11-1 in favor of the plaintiffs.</p>
<p>Trial Digest Vol. 12 No. 17</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-2/">Medical Malpractice Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parapalegic Trucker Win Suit Again Wheelchair Lift Manufacturer in Amount of $536,827</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/parapalegic-trucker-win-suit-again-wheelchair-lift-manufacturer-in-amount-of-536827/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Parapalegic trucker wins suit again wheelchair lift manufacturer in amount of $536,827 After having a wheelchair list insltalled on his truck and having that lift malfunction in freezing wheater conditions the said plaintiff brought suit against the manufacturer. The plaintiff suffered a broken leg and mutiple complications. Keegan Vs. Joytech International, Inc. Verdict $536,827</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/parapalegic-trucker-win-suit-again-wheelchair-lift-manufacturer-in-amount-of-536827/">Parapalegic Trucker Win Suit Again Wheelchair Lift Manufacturer in Amount of $536,827</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parapalegic trucker wins suit again wheelchair lift manufacturer in amount of $536,827</p>
<p>After having a wheelchair list insltalled on his truck and having that lift malfunction in freezing wheater conditions the said plaintiff brought suit against the manufacturer.  The plaintiff suffered a broken leg and mutiple complications. </p>
<p>Keegan Vs. Joytech International, Inc. Verdict $536,827</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/parapalegic-trucker-win-suit-again-wheelchair-lift-manufacturer-in-amount-of-536827/">Parapalegic Trucker Win Suit Again Wheelchair Lift Manufacturer in Amount of $536,827</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to Diganose Woman&#8217;s Cancer Results in Settlement of $250,000</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/failure-to-diganose-womans-cancer-results-in-settlement-of-250000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Failure to diganose woman&#8217;s cancer results in settlement of $250,000 After having visited a healthcare facility and being notified of a lump in her breast a woman discovers 1year later it was malignant breast cancer. Upon learning of the correct diagnosis the women was treated and brought suit against Nurse Practitioner who denied that the...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/failure-to-diganose-womans-cancer-results-in-settlement-of-250000/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/failure-to-diganose-womans-cancer-results-in-settlement-of-250000/">Failure to Diganose Woman&#8217;s Cancer Results in Settlement of $250,000</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failure to diganose woman&#8217;s cancer results in settlement of $250,000</p>
<p>After having visited a healthcare facility and being notified of a lump in her breast a woman discovers 1year later it was malignant breast cancer.  Upon learning of the correct diagnosis the women was treated and brought suit against Nurse Practitioner who denied that the standard of care was breached. The case was settled through arbitration for $250,000.</p>
<p>Kim Vs. Kaiser &#8211; Binding Arbitration &#8211; $250,000</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/failure-to-diganose-womans-cancer-results-in-settlement-of-250000/">Failure to Diganose Woman&#8217;s Cancer Results in Settlement of $250,000</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Malpractice Suit Leads to Quick Settlement</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-leads-to-quick-settlement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Medical Malpractice suit leads to quick settlement &#8211; $1,150,000.00 Plaintiff after having received sub par care during a delicate sugery in which his esophogus was peirced filed suit against the doctors performing the sugery and won a settlement. The physicians in the case claimed the surgical procedure they provided was no a breach of the...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-leads-to-quick-settlement/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-leads-to-quick-settlement/">Medical Malpractice Suit Leads to Quick Settlement</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medical Malpractice suit leads to quick settlement &#8211; $1,150,000.00</p>
<p>Plaintiff after having received sub par care during a delicate sugery in which his esophogus was peirced filed suit against the doctors performing the sugery and won a settlement.  The physicians in the case claimed the surgical procedure they provided was no a breach of the standard of care but decided to settle 1 day prior to the case going to trial.</p>
<p>Hagstrom vs. Regents of the Univ. of CA &#8211; Settlement &#8211; $1,150,000.00</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/medical-malpractice-suit-leads-to-quick-settlement/">Medical Malpractice Suit Leads to Quick Settlement</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Malpractice Claim Results in Judgment of $381,600</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/legal-malpractice-claim-results-in-judgment-of-381600/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Legal Malpractice claim results in judgment of $381,600 After less then sound legal advice was given to the plaintiff in the original legal action she undertook the said plaintiff&#8217;s case was thrown out and was charged with perjury. Due to the situation the plaintif filed suit against the original firm representing her and won a...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/legal-malpractice-claim-results-in-judgment-of-381600/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/legal-malpractice-claim-results-in-judgment-of-381600/">Legal Malpractice Claim Results in Judgment of $381,600</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal Malpractice claim results in judgment of $381,600</p>
<p>After less then sound legal advice was given to the plaintiff in the original legal action she undertook the said plaintiff&#8217;s case was thrown out and was charged with perjury.  Due to the situation the plaintif filed suit against the original firm representing her and won a judgement of $381,600 plus all legal fees incurred.</p>
<p>Cioffi Vs. Silberberg &#038; Ross &#8211; judgment $381,600 plus all legal fees.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/legal-malpractice-claim-results-in-judgment-of-381600/">Legal Malpractice Claim Results in Judgment of $381,600</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hand Surgery Mishap Forces Law Student to File Suit</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/hand-surgery-mishap-forces-law-student-to-file-suit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hand surgery mishap forces law student to file suit &#8211; awarded $508,000 in damages Martin Stanley Law Offices represents plaintiff in a medical malpractice suit for law student. After a minor surgery to remove a small mass on the plaintiffs right index finger results in permanent injury. The attending surgeon cut a tendon on the...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/hand-surgery-mishap-forces-law-student-to-file-suit/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/hand-surgery-mishap-forces-law-student-to-file-suit/">Hand Surgery Mishap Forces Law Student to File Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hand surgery mishap forces law student to file suit &#8211; awarded $508,000 in damages</p>
<p>Martin Stanley Law Offices represents plaintiff in a medical malpractice suit for law student. After a minor surgery to remove a small mass on the plaintiffs right index finger results in permanent injury.  The attending surgeon cut a tendon on the index finger of the plaintiff leaving the finger swollen and deformed. The case was won and the plaintiff was awarded $508,000 as the original offer from defense was $20,000. The trial lasted 8 days, deliberation of 1.5 days and 12-0 vote on contributory negligence.</p>
<p>O&#8217;Briens Verdictum Juris 3/26/96<br />
Denoff vs. Markowitz M.D.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/hand-surgery-mishap-forces-law-student-to-file-suit/">Hand Surgery Mishap Forces Law Student to File Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxi Cab Passenger Sustains Broken Ankle Due to Cab Driver Negligence</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/taxi-cab-passenger-sustains-broken-ankle-due-to-cab-driver-negligence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=85</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Taxi Cab passenger sustains broken ankle due to cab driver negligence results in judgment of $236,909 Representing the plaintiff the Law offices of Martin Stanley achieves success in the case against a negligent taxi cab driver. As the passenger was exiting cab the driver of the cab accelerated and ran over the passengers foot resulting...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/taxi-cab-passenger-sustains-broken-ankle-due-to-cab-driver-negligence/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/taxi-cab-passenger-sustains-broken-ankle-due-to-cab-driver-negligence/">Taxi Cab Passenger Sustains Broken Ankle Due to Cab Driver Negligence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxi Cab passenger sustains broken ankle due to cab driver negligence results in judgment of $236,909</p>
<p>Representing the plaintiff the Law offices of Martin Stanley achieves success in the case against a negligent taxi cab driver.  As the passenger was exiting cab the driver of the cab accelerated and ran over the passengers foot resulting in a broken ankle. The original offer from the defendants counsel was $80,000 and the final <strong>judgment in the case was $236,909</strong>.  The trial lasted 4 days with deliberation of 1.25 hrs and a 12-0 decision on negligence.</p>
<p>Trials Digest &#8211; April 28, 2003 Vol 6 No. 17<br />
Johnson vs. Yellow Cab</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/taxi-cab-passenger-sustains-broken-ankle-due-to-cab-driver-negligence/">Taxi Cab Passenger Sustains Broken Ankle Due to Cab Driver Negligence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Precious Metals Prospector Files Suit Against Attorney for Negligent Advice</title>
		<link>https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/precious-metals-prospector-files-suit-against-attorney-for-negligent-advice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Results]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstanleylaw.com/?p=83</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Represented by Martin Stanley law offices said plaintiff claimed negligent legal counsel. The suit alleged less than sound legal advice and result of that advice was the loss of use of 81 prospecting claims. In the case the defendants original offer to plaintiff was $350,000 and the final judgment in the case ended up being...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/precious-metals-prospector-files-suit-against-attorney-for-negligent-advice/"> [ Read More ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/precious-metals-prospector-files-suit-against-attorney-for-negligent-advice/">Precious Metals Prospector Files Suit Against Attorney for Negligent Advice</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Represented by Martin Stanley law offices said plaintiff claimed negligent legal counsel. The suit alleged less than sound legal advice and result of that advice was the loss of use of 81 prospecting claims. In the case the defendants original offer to plaintiff was $350,000 and the final judgment in the case ended up being $950,000.  Final verdict 11-1, deliberation was 1.5 hrs.</p>
<p>Trials Digest &#8211; March 24, 2003 Vol 6 No 12 Van Ert vs. Harris &#8211; Jury Trial &#8211; <strong>Verdict/Judgement $950,000</strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com/precious-metals-prospector-files-suit-against-attorney-for-negligent-advice/">Precious Metals Prospector Files Suit Against Attorney for Negligent Advice</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.martinstanleylaw.com">LA Medical Malpractice Attorney | Martin Louis Stanley</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
